|
|
|
|
|
|
by llm_trw
832 days ago
|
|
|
> You double dipped, use outdated numbers, hand waved, and still didn't get orders of magnitude difference. Feel free to provide better numbers. Those are the two largest most recent projects. That those numbers disagree with what studies say they should be aren't a problem with the numbers, but problems with the studies. Also you should read up on the difference between power and energy since you're confusing the two in pretty much every line of your post. Watts aren't joules and joules aren't watts. |
|
|
I did provide a US example for an apples to apples comparison. Providing lower numbers is irrelevant when higher numbers already prove the point.
> Also you should read up on the difference between power and energy since you're confusing the two in pretty much every line of your post. Watts aren't joules and joules aren't watts.
Don't hand wave, pick a single example.
If you don't understand my notation you can simply compare 2 * 1.1 GW nuclear reactors * 24h = 52.8 GWh per day. The battery example you gave was 400MW * 4h = 1.6GWh per day. 52.8 GWh / 1.6 GWh= 33x. I used 36x for a total of 20.16 Billion dollars.