|
|
|
|
|
|
by po
831 days ago
|
|
|
Yeah that's not how it works though... nobody is saying lead causes violent crime. Nobody is claiming crime can't go back up without lead. Of course there are better causative factors. It's just that meta-analysis over many studies seems to show that it is a contributor to crime. When it is removed from the environment, it then shows up in the crime data. |
|
|
many studies seems to show that it is a contributor to crime."
This seems contradictory. How can it not cause violent crime yet be a causative factor?
I can see how it might be correlated. But I've never heard a compelling argument for how it would be causative.on any significant level.