[samatman]

At least one, obviously, and a rather large one at that.

The point of the comment you replied to is that conventional CV software can recognize the patterns in tests like Ravens Progressive Matrices just fine, and a simple logic tree can then solve them, while the LLM approach is still struggling to get the same result.

This a commonplace shortcoming of the current generation of LLMs: ironically, they often fail at tasks which computers can do perfectly using conventional software.