|
|
|
|
|
by kken
826 days ago
|
|
Call me ignorant, but I am extremely put off by products that blatantly rip off naming schemes and essentially position themselves as a copy of another product. Granted, "Orange" went through a number of itereation and is now less similar to the product it originally copied. From the article: "Like many, it is let down by its software support..." Well yes, no news. This was always the strength of the original Rapsberry Pi and is the reason why most of the impulse-bought copied products end up in the parts bin. |
|
For this product: what's up with that 4GB RAM in such a small / cheap SBC that's rather sparse in connectivity & storage options?
For deeply embedded uses, uC board like RPi Pico seems more appropiate. Or go wild & do similar things with GPU-included, 256/512MB boards like RPi Zero.
For a tiny desktop machine: sure, but if you need an add-on connector board to be useful, wouldn't a compute module + carrier board be more appropiate? Or a slightly bigger board with more connectors?
Maybe this is targeted at specific application(s) that need gobs of RAM but not much else?
Or is 4GB RAM that cheap these days that manufacturer included it anyway?