[g051051]

It's unlikely that "regulators" had anything to do with it, given the quick resolution. I'd be more inclined to think that Epic went back to Apple hat-in-hand and begged to be let back in, probably promising to muzzle Sweeney.

[sigmar]

>It's unlikely that "regulators" had anything to do with it, given the quick resolution.

Disagree. EU regulators act quickly. Here's the commissioner for Internal Market of the Eu: "I take note with satisfaction that following our contacts Apple decided to backtrack its decision on Epic exclusion. From Day 2, #DMA is already showing very concrete results!" https://twitter.com/ThierryBreton/status/1766167580497117464

[albert180]

Yes very unlikely, that Apple didn't want to try out the new 10% penalty of global turnover, after the commission said she is looking into it and days after Apple was bonked with a 1.8bn fine for violating antitrust regulations

[stephc_int13]

Very unlikely, knowing who Sweeney is. And he is pretty much in control of Epic.

[agust]

Sure, Apple takes a strong decision which breaks a just-enforced law, and two days later they back down because they had a nice talk with Epic. /s

The EU told Apple that breaking the law would have dire consequences. That's the only reason Apple backed down.

Stop spreading Apple propaganda.

[johnnyanmac]

It's good scrutiny to have, but I'm surprised that there are now at leat 3 users here that really believe that Apple reversed course in 3 days out of the goodness of their hearts. I can't even get a response from many customer services in 3 days. No company thst big turns on a dime without extreme arm twisting.

[internetter]

Can confirm. I've been waiting for Apple's developer support to reply to me since before this debacle. I finally got a response 2 hours ago – after I resolved my issue – that stated they are busy right now.

[kj100]

> The EU told Apple that breaking the law would have dire consequences. That's the only reason Apple backed down.

You have no idea that this is what happened. You're the one spreading propaganda.

Why propagandize it at all?

EPIC hates Apple and wants to see the App store dead. Apple reasonably didn't trust EPIC not to play games with the DMA. The EU asked EPIC to give an assurance that they would play by the rules and then forced Apple to accept that assurance. Neither of them won anything. Apple is forced to let EPIC in, and EPIC is forced to accept that Apple is complying with the DMA.

That fits the facts. EPIC isn't a good guy. Apple isn't a good guy. The EU isn't a hero. Why try to paint any of them this way?

[stale2002]

> EPIC is forced to accept that Apple is complying with the DMA.

No they don't. They are absolutely still able to start a lawsuit, as is the EU.

We likely won't have to wait more than a couple weeks to see the lawsuits filed.

[lttlrck]

until that lawsuit is filed and we have a judgement, yes, they are.

[stale2002]

> until that lawsuit is filed

So then this would be the process of not accepting Apple's interpretation of the DMA.

Thats my point. That is the exact process for which they would be rejecting Apple's interpretation.

So no, they don't have to accept Apple's interpretation, instead they can go through this process.

[throw10920]

> Stop spreading Apple propaganda.

Please don't try to start flame wars on HN. You should read the guidelines:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html