Right now, speaker identification (and thus everything downstream that depends on that) works better for meetings where Circleback joins the call (compared to those imported) but I wanted to share this anyway.
The summary is very high quality! Thanks for that.
I think the thing I'd like most is if the AI could "cite" its source (i.e. provide a timestamp of when exactly the statement was made that it's summarizing) directly inline in the summary (vs. only in the transcript).
Similarly to how they're used in AI-powered search (e.g. Perplexity), inline citations would help me easily cross-reference statements and gain confidence that the summary is accurate and the information can be relied on.
It's kind of weird to transcribe a meeting from someone who isn't your customer and use it in marketing material (this post). Folks who don't have the context would think GitLab is a customer of yours and you have their permission for using their stuff in marketing.
I would expect them to showcase their dogfooding of the product. Just use it for every internal meeting and cherry-pick the best result to put on display.