|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
837 days ago
|
|
AT and PS/2 never caught on names with the public. It was still just "PC" or "IBM PC compatible" even when talking more formally. Regular people would only refer specificially to AT or PS/2 when buying motherboards or peripherals. |
|
But still, I am curious. 386 PS/2s were expensive.
My first job had a Model 70-A21 as a demo box:
https://www.ardent-tool.com/qtechinfo/GJAN-43WJX8.html
First 3.5" hard disk I ever saw. Blazing speed for 1988. A 25MHZ 386! With secondary cache!
This thing was $10,500 for the base spec, if I remember rightly -- it's over 35 years ago -- and that excluded a keyboard, monitor and DOS.
In my 2nd year in that job I bought a 2nd hand Acorn Archimedes A310. 8MHz ARM 2, 1MB RAM, 20MB hard disk.
It was considerably quicker than that IBM. Like 4-8x the speed. And it was £800 used. With a screen, keyboard and RISC OS!
Probably £1500 new, so about one tenth of the price of a comparably-specified Model 70.
My point being... as someone said upthread, they didn't know anyone with a private Mac home computer. Yeah, well, a 386 PS/2 was even more expensive than a Mac.