|
|
|
|
|
by CrazyStat
839 days ago
|
|
Well, I'm discarding whole experiments. Each experiment is reported in full, I just don't publish all of them. No scientist ever does. His claim about likelihoods being immune to p-hacking is far too strong. > With p-values, sometimes even honest experiments end up with misleading conclusions. It takes a decent amount of complex understanding to perform properly, while something like gathering data and doing a conditional probability calculation has presumably less risk of honest mistakes Maybe. I've seen an experienced Bayesian statistician who had published a paper about Lindley's paradox fall prey to Lindley's paradox and publish a misleading conclusion as a result. Bayesian analysis also has some pitfalls. Name withheld to protect the innocent. |
|