| > No, you are just trying to justify the greedy corporation habits. You're really showing off your ignorance here, and you're assuming a lot around my defending of greed etc. My view's on Apple's pricing are pretty irrelevant here, and I have nothing to say for or against them because I frankly don't care and don't know the logistics behind them. All the times I've worked on projects that involve shipping an operating system, hardware, etc I've found that there are a lot of tradeoffs especially when you're doing something a little bit different. This is the case with M# silicon and also the case with Windows on Snapdragon systems. They aren't starting with expandable hardware built for running desktop PCs, they (apple, Qualcomm) are starting with highly integrated SoCs that have some really narrow goals around power and battery life. Their systems are more designed for running phones and tablets than for entry level laptops. > No, they segmented their products and their fanbois are not only drunk their koolaid but eagerly defend it too. Don't like it? Don't buy one. But fact is, their more narrow model for how a PC can be built is selling really well and very few regular people miss their second monitor because of it. |
Ah, yes, Mr. Highhorse.
> This is the case with M# silicon
Except there are two Thunderbolt/USB4 ports on M2 Macs which can drive 40Gbit of data and supports DP2.0 Alt Mode.
There is no limitation on what port you should use for external display, each one would work.
Which means that the hardware is fully capable of running whatever amount of the external displas you want.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/109523
> Don't buy one
Yes, but don't sell me "Apple M* is da best" shit, okay?
> and very few regular people miss their second monitor because of it
Ah, yes, lack of a second monitor is freedom. Koolaid in it's finest.