| By the article: 1. There seems to be sanctioned and "external events". It happened at an external event. But it seems to have been some event related to the conference. 2. The article didn't say that, as far as I understand. Apparently, he wasn't there on behalf of his employer. In any case, he apparently got invited by an attending former colleague. Again, context of the conference. 3. It was a "legal tech" conference. What? > But, how is this not an incredibly misleading attempt to get clicks by making it tech-related? It's NPR, what kind of motives are you suggesting here? Pumping engagement metrics to get government funding? I think, you intentionally framed the article at least as much, as you lament here. |
"Then they hit up a bar called The Three Monkeys, not far from the Hilton conference hotel in Midtown Manhattan." It sounds like they just went to get drinks at a bar. It being near the conference venue is meaningless, this is midtown Manhattan, there's 10 bars on every block and probably half a dozen conferences going on at any given time.
Someone else already addressed your second point.
> 3. It was a "legal tech" conference. What?
"Legalweek New York is the one week in which thousands of legal professionals gather to explore the Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting the industry" (from https://www.event.law.com/legalweek/who-we-are)
Any conference in any industry is probably going to involve technology at least a bit, because it's 2024 and technology is everywhere. That doesn't make it a "tech conference".