|
|
|
|
|
by frognumber
841 days ago
|
|
Cancer is a mutation. Much of the most promising recent work I've read on therapies focuses on: 1) Understanding the specific mutations 2) Helping the immune system find way to identify, and therefore attack, those specific cancer cells More of the work focuses on t-cells, but otherwise, it's not too dissimilar from the work on infections. I should know better than to discuss medicine on a SWE forum. Every post here starts with an insult. Not a single post contains any technical detail, nor even clues that people even understand the words I'm using (t-cell, MHC, etc.). It's like arguing with a cross between a five-year-old and a teenager who knows better. I think I'm done here. There is no point. |
|
Cancer is not "a" mutation, and that is the whole problem.
You are talking about personalised neoantigen-specific t-cells as a generic cure for cancer, while ignoring the fact that not all generations of a cancer express neoantigens, or even the same neoantigens.
Ergo, it is a therapy, NOT a cure.