[Groxx]

Same - DOT is a great way to go from zero to functional in near minimal time. It's also pretty trivial to generate since it's not order dependent, which is great for lightweight automation.

Fine-tuning layout can be a real hassle though, sadly. I haven't found any quick tools for that yet.

[kevindamm]

The way I approach fine-tuning DOT layout is to add subgroups where it seems appropriate, add a 1px border for the subgroup and see where the layout engine is situating it next to other nearby vertices/edges. Sometimes I may have to put a border around a few subgroups, then attempt to adjust size of vertices and entire area to nudge it to a local minima. Note: I don't attempt to adjust the size of the subgroups, I'm not sure that even works anyway, but maybe it depends on the choice of layout algorithm, too. Padding and other style on the vertex-box may help, too. It's been a few years for me, tbh.

Deciding where the appropriate subgroups are is a bit of an art. Sometimes it's obvious, as in bipartite graphs that are intentionally bipartite. Or, if there is a staged layout like for pipeline architectures. Sometimes it's not obvious even when it seems it should be, like when graphviz really wants to make a certain edge really short. Be ready to backtrack sometimes. Then I usually remove the subgroup border after I'm done, but a few times they have been useful to leave there.

One thing I really like about DOT is that adding hyperlinks to the vertices and edges that translate decently into the compiled output is really nice. I had an oncall dashboard that made liberal use of this feature that I still think back on fondly sometimes.

[whitten]

Can you point to where I can learn more about this ? E.G. an example and explanation exists for hyper link embedding ?

I am especially interested in syntax suitable to be used in creating something to input into https://www.viz-js.com and creation of SVGs with embedded hyperlinks.

[Izkata]

If you're using subgraphs, with an edge across subgraph boundaries, it is slightly order dependent - a node will appear in the area it was first mentioned in. If you define all the nodes/subgraphs first and all the edges at the bottom you'd never notice this though.