|
|
|
|
|
by dappermanneke
833 days ago
|
|
the tragedy of languages making an accent on functional programming is that CS education simply does not make a big enough focus on learning that paradigm, which takes a lot of effort to learn, and then there are simply not enough people to hire for reasonable money to seriously maintain these codebases this self filters only the most committed and possibly eccentric programmers to keep using them, which again reinforces the loop. this is a shame because OOP, which has few of the theoretical and practical benefits of FP, is regularly taught |
|
I don't really buy into the lack of talent/skill argument. Especially given that F# isn't exactly the most hardcore FP language and toolchain out there. I hire and onboard people from many kinds of background to a non-trivial Scala codebase. Even new grads coming from mostly Python notebooks do all right.
This is also supported by all modern OO languages going somewhat hybrid, as they adopt an increasing number of functional features.
If you're looking for an explanation as to why FP isn't more popular, I think it's mostly the fact that modern high-level languages have become good enough. And Go has proven that even an objectively bad language can succeed if the developer experience and productivity improve in other dimensions.