Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by piva00 843 days ago
Apple is not taking in consideration that the argument works completely in reverse, without all the apps paying them a 30% cut, or developers investing time into creating apps for their ecosystem there would be no iOS in 2024.
2 comments

I don't think this is a valid argument, because both sides of it are true. Developers invested, but so did Apple, and they did it first and took bigger risks.

The App Store is packed with apps because developers saw an opportunity and wanted to seize it. Everyone's in it because it serves their interests.

This is a reversal of history.

The iPhone released without an App Store. Their original plan was very clearly to limit it to web apps. Apple, including Steve Jobs, spent a lot of time and energy explaining why web apps were the best option.

And then Apple realized, largely through apps developed for jailbroken phones which led to a lot of people jailbreaking their phones, that for iOS to really succeed they needed apps.

Windows Phone 7 is another example of this. It was a superior OS to iOS by most measures. It died almost entirely because of the lack of major apps.

If major app providers (Google, Spotify, Netflix, etc) had never made their apps available on iOS and had made them available on Android instead iOS would probably be looking like Windows Phone 7 right now.

It's a symbiotic relationship like most things. Instagram, tiktok, Spotify, etc. would very likely not exist without the app store.

I'm torn in all of this because I'm not much of a fan of either company.

Spotify existed before the App Store though.
They are working the narrative as hard as they can.