|
|
|
|
|
by hnfong
841 days ago
|
|
> The open-source world was at least 10 years ahead. I'm not sure it is the win you're suggesting. I had brief stints with CVS and TBH it really sucked. Luckily when I started coding seriously (which coincided with my first job), SVN just reached 1.0 and it was OK. This was 2004 already. IMHO, the whole situation was fixed only after Linus decided he had enough of the crap and wrote his own. |
|
All I wanted to stress is that the "lock-before-you-can-touch" approach was the norm in the enterprise world at the time. IMHO, this fact alone made SVN (even CVS) better than all the commercial products which I used at the time.
When some of the "enterprise" world started adopting SVN and commercial products started relaxing the locking mandate, the open-source world was already embarked on the decentralized model (git, darcs, arch, mercurial, etc).