|
|
|
|
|
|
by zozbot234
838 days ago
|
|
|
Interesting comment for sure. Of course if this is intended behaviour it should at least be properly documented, since other implementations don't seem to do this random "upgrading" of a shared to an exclusive lock and it does create an issue whenever readers might be waiting on one another while holding the lock as shown in OP's code. |
|
|