|
|
|
|
|
by userbinator
839 days ago
|
|
If that "rbmm" is the same person as I've seen on other sites, and the characteristic non-native English is a clue that it is, he certainly knows his stuff. threads holding the lock don't wait for each other Unless you're doing nested locking. |
|
In my experience, needing to do nested locking is a sign you're up the wrong creek.
I've rewritten some interfaces and implementations from using nested locking to non-nested, and they became easier to use and much faster.
Not saying there's never a place for them, but I avoid nested locking like the plague.