[devaiops9001]

You're just digging yourself into a dumber and dumber hole. Analogy is not a substitute for argument.

>> In both cases you can't see the important parts: calculations/energy conversion

The layers they postulate were very clearly visible to the naked eye.

>> Hell, even a match flame has visible layers and is also part plasma.

These layers were not postulated. Another analogy.

>> Nah, the analogy is excellent and

"yaY i WiN", okay champ

[lostmsu]

> Analogy is not a substitute for argument.

I mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy

Thanks, but I am done. You're too stupid. Too bad you will forget about that by the time that pseudoscientific snake oil company collapses.

[dang]

Whoa—your comments in this thread have been way over the line at which we ban accounts. Worse, you've done it in other threads recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39577225, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39573437.

This is way over the line at which we ban accounts. I'm not going to ban you right now because you've been here a long time and it doesn't look like your account has a long history of being abusive. But please don't post like this to HN again.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules, we'd appreciate it.

[lostmsu]

Sorry, you are right. I've been replying in kind instead of just flagging.