Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kken 843 days ago
Why is the age of any relevance here?
4 comments

45 year engineer, not 45 year old engineer. It's not about their age but their experience.

The relevance is that someone spent 45 years, as a trained adult engineer no less, not 45 years merely breathing, aware of a problem and only after than much experience, solved it.

It would also be interesting if they had been a 1 year engineer or not an engineer at all, just for different reasons.

In what part of the world is it typical to say "45 year engineer"? I'm an engineer in the western US, and would say "an engineer with 45 years of experience". I interact with lotsa international english; this one is new
I have definitely seen that before. In any case, despite the website being owned by an American, the language is not common American English:

> He is enjoying his sauna 4-6 times a week. Instead of watching the “idiot TV”, Malcolm has spent his evening watching his thermal meters in his hot room.

One would not use the present continuous tense in that context as much as in that sentence.

The words are the words. No one else can help the fact that you interpret words that weren't either written or implied.

A 10 year smoker may or may not also be a 10 year old smoker, but probably not.

A 6 month project may or may not also be a 6 month old project. Etc etc.

Fwiw it didn't read naturally to me either. I suppose I'd say 'an engineer of [or 'for'] 45 years'. Or 'Malcolm, 45 years an engineer, [...]'.
what kind of engineer? software engineer? ;D
No a real engineer.
you're tryin to make friends? i'd be a little careful around here
I'm not to worried. ;-) My friends don't have ego problems.
dude, I'm just trying to help you
Because, he's FORTY FIVE! He's FRAIL with one foot LITERALLY in the GRAVE!! j/k. Someone mentioned that he has 45 years of experience. That makes him closer to 65. If he's still doing cool shit, thats pretty cool.

I wish they'd explain the problem in a short sentence before diving right in. Maybe this blog is for people who already know what the issues with an electric sauna are... bad ventilation, I assume.

If you read the article, the problem is explained quite well:

> In my simple mind, the Finnish Sauna is just a type of Heat Treat Furnace or Oven that you load humans into and try to provide them with three characteristics. (1) not oversaturate their lungs with their own Carbon Dioxide waste products from being enclosed in a sauna with poor ventilation and limited fresh air volume changes (called Air Mixing in the study), (2) create an enjoyable Temperature distribution within the sauna environment (called Temperatures in the study) and lastly (3) provide a well distributed Ladled Steam Humidity cloud throughout the Sauna (called Air Condition in the study). Basically, everything you would expect for a good Finnish Sauna experience.

The rest of the article explains the ventilation needed for this.

That’s not an explanation of the problem though, those are just characteristics of a good sauna.

I don’t see the problem defined well in the article, but it can mostly be surmised from the intro:

> Malcolm has analyzed the Finnish 1992 sauna ventilation study profile, applied his knowledge and experience as a 45 year engineer to test and better understand sauna ventilation in his own backyard sauna.

They wanted to test and understand the sauna ventilation in his backyard sauna and used a 1992 research paper as a reference. I can only assume this venture started because they were dissatisfied with the ventilation in their backyard sauna.

Is he 45, or has he been an engineer for 45 years? Either way, I wish I had this guy’s sauna.
If his sauna is the one in the picture, it has a flaw. Benches are placed too low. Your feet should be approximately at the level of the top of the stones. The sauna looks similar to a barrel sauna and they often are too low due to curvature to allow placing benches high enough
45 year not 45 years old