[lobocinza]

Of course not. I identify cronyism as an inherent characteristic of representative democracies but I don't advocate for it. I follow the non-aggression principle so no matter how rich or how poor nobody should have rights over others or their property. I'm in favor of going towards anarcho-capitalism and stateless societies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism

[scotty79]

But why not? If letting people with money decide is the purest form of democracy as you wrote?

Aren't you in favor of purest form of democracy?

I understand that you are a fan of anarchism but given that it's impossible shouldn't you be in favor of the next best thing?

[lobocinza]

There's no point in talking further you're either super dumb, malicious or both.

[scotty79]

I'm neither, but you first call voting with wallet the purest form of democracy, but if democracy actually worked like that you call it cronyism. That's really curious.