|
|
|
|
|
by senkora
846 days ago
|
|
The draw of Gemini was always that it was a New York-regulated crypto exchange that presented as similar to traditional exchanges. For institutional traders, they even provide a standard FIX API over cross-connect in the NY5 data center in New Jersey. This is something that institutions understand how to connect to and work with. (In contrast, most crypto exchanges have/had highly bespoke systems of questionable quality) https://docs.gemini.com/fix-marketdata/ So the Gemini Earn thing has always confused me. If your entire shtick is legitimacy and being subject to competent regulation, then why would you release a product like that? I guess I’ll have to attribute it to the reality-distortion field of the crypto hype. They must have actually believed that either 1) the product was sound or 2) they would avoid the fallout when it exploded. |
|
We call it greed, but it’s a consistent feature of trusted institutions being tempted to sell out that brand for short-term gains.
My hypothesis is the trusted market is efficient, and so tends towards consolidation and low margins. The untrusted market is more cottage-like, with small players and large margins. If you’re an institution, it’s tempting to try that high-margin field, leveraging your trusted brand for scale.