[ffgjgf1]

> You're talking as if there is a way to get an 'unbiased' AI. There isn't. It is inherently biased by its training, it hallucinates, and it is further biased by its prompt.

Certainly. Doesn’t mean that we still shouldn’t prioritize accuracy and integrity instead of purposefully increasing the amount of bias even further.

> you're utterly baffled why they would make that choice over any other.

I’m not. I’m baffled that there are people defending that choice (especially in such a way)

> and promote diversity

Why? I mean why do you think this is the right way to do it? Surely going out of your way to make sure that your model does its best to doctor the images it creates to conform to some political agenda (whatever that might be) would achieve the opposite because it actually legitimizes the things the other side is constantly saying? (and due to the potentially severe backlash from more moderate fraction of the society)