|
|
|
|
|
by patientzero
839 days ago
|
|
For someone as described being able to do loops in python is equivalent to expecting a theoretical mathematician to be good at accounting.. It is kind of a coincidence if these people write code on the side or do their own accounting. |
|
Again, I don't know if it applies to the Reddit poster, but I sure met people like this.
One example, not an academic, but someone who claimed he "revolutionized" his Important Department at Big Corp using ML and NNs, and didn't know what gradient descent is. I don't mean he couldn't implement it on the spot, rather be never heard of it, and couldn't understand when I described it to him.
Another one, PhD candidate in computer science at top-10 uni, self-described "expert" in C++, could not, indeed, write a C++ for loop over an integer range. Or indeed a for loop in any language of his choice - he had known, but forgot. He had a number of publications that sounded sane.
Anyway, if someone is an ML academic, wants an industry job, and can't code enough, that would probably lead to the described outcome. And again, I'm not jumping to that conclusion.