|
|
|
|
|
|
by vsl
5149 days ago
|
|
|
Err, yes, I do blame the site for abusing HTML. If they misuse text markup to represent what is semantically an image, how is that my fault? HTML has <img> for a reason. There's perfectly suitable markup for text and another for images: using the former for the latter is no less idiotic than doing it the other way around. This fad is supremely annoying. |
|
|