Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dclowd9901 846 days ago
I think the wording is clumsy, but this is analogous no-blame processes. The wording is just accounting for the possibility of wontonly malicious or recklessly negligent work quality. Think someone either sabotaging the product, or showing up to work very high or drunk.
1 comments

This.

A mistake like "accidentally turning the machine off when it shouldn't be" is a fixable problem.

If someone has attitude like "fuck the checklist, I know better", it is not really a mistake, and that person should be rightfully fired or at least moved to a position where they cannot do any harm.