[coldtea]

>The Turing test was never our standard for sentience, no.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts

>It tests whether a machine is perceptive and expressive enough to be perceived as intelligent, which is not even close to the same thing as being sentient.

The same is true for other humans, we don't know if they're sentient, just that they appear to be, that is, they talk and act like it.

[rafram]

Sorry, you’re not gonna be able to find a source for the Turing test determining sentience. It was never meant to do that. Snide Wikipedia links or not!

I actually do know that other humans are sentient.