|
|
|
|
|
by concordDance
849 days ago
|
|
> And really, in that situation, why should anyone feel ethically bound to be efficient and do what's best for the company? They should do what is best for society. Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher production of goods and services for lower price, leading to a wealthier society. > The company executives almost certainly have it in their power to set incentives so doing the most efficient, best-for-the-company thing is what's going to give each employee the biggest reward. They do not. This is a ridiculously hard unsolved problem. The alignment problem may actually be the hardest problem we have. |
|
This may be true. But I think it would be wise to consider an alternative:
Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher extraction of wealth from society at large to the owners and leaders of the company, leading to a more unequal and poorer society.
Probably not all companies are in the second way, but to think all are in the first way sounds naive to me.
> The alignment problem may actually be the hardest problem we have.
Hah, reading this makes me think you already understand that your assertion about companies operating efficiently is false. Yet you wrote it...