[sneakay]

Given you mention NAACP I'm assuming your comment refers to US-based organizations.

In that respect "feminists" won a landmark victory in 1973 that was just recently overturned in Roe v Wade. That's one example of the importance of "sticking around".

As all your examples are of groups leaning one particular way politically I'll proffer another example from other side.

Consider the NRA, presumably they don't need to exist as the 2nd amendment enshrines the right in our constitution.

As you may point out that right is under constant threat. Apply that same logic to the groups you're disparaging and you may better understand their purpose.

[jjjjj55555]

I don't feel any differently about the NRA. They're yet another group that's peddling a never ending culture war.

[sneakay]

The "culture war" just resulted in the reversal of Roe v Wade denying millions of women with healthcare access. The current and previous presidents both called for depriving people of their constitutional 2nd amendment rights. Even if you specifically dislike the NRA their stated purpose is objectively needed.

To reorient the discussion back on topic, the Sharky Principle is often weaponized by those who don't understand the ongoing endangerment of our basic rights. Even with immediate relevant examples like Dobbs v Jackson. Though it may be broadly applicable across organizations it's important to pick good examples.

[bigstrat2003]

> The "culture war" just resulted in the reversal of Roe v Wade denying millions of women with healthcare access.

I don't really think it's accurate to describe abortion as "healthcare access". Whatever your views on the topic may be, the situation is more complex than that.

[acdha]

It really is that simple. Women are at severe risk now if they develop certain normal conditions which are mathematically certain to happen to a number of people every year, but now they have to leave to free states (if they can) or plead with a court system to get life/fertility-saving healthcare because the medical treatment is an abortion. Anyone doing IVF especially has to worry about that because there are more situations which can go wrong with elevated risk of death or loss of fertility. It’s not even directly reproductive care: some things like chemotherapy have the risk of complications due to pregnancy during treatment, which has numerous documented cases where treatment was delayed waiting for proof that someone isn’t pregnant because state law prohibits an abortion if that happens.

There’s another aspect which again really is that simple: the liability risk of having some theocrat second-guess their medical expertise means that hospitals are closing obstetric departments and doctors are leaving repressive states. Reduced access guarantees that people who would have had medical care a few years ago do not today.

https://www.idahostatesman.com/living/health-fitness/article...