|
|
|
|
|
|
by codeulike
845 days ago
|
|
|
Right, but if you're a developer you might as well use something more developery. Like the selling point of Access was supposed to be that non-coders could use it to knock together a database. In the late 90s I built some quite big things in Access and promptly regretted it. I guess Access got used for those projects because the organisation already 'owned' it as part of the Office bundle whereas Visual Studio 6 was seen as 'expensive' (I think it was about £500 per developer or something). But these days that problem would not occur. The days of development tools needing comparatively expensive licences are over. |
|
|
> The days of development tools needing comparatively expensive licences are over.
That's exactly the motivation I saw for Access being used in the past. I agree, those days are over and that justification for using Access is moot.