Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by disillusioned 845 days ago
That single sentence contains multitudes:

* Production should be immutable

* No one doing dev in a dev environment should have such trivial access to prod

* Are there still good reasons for a migration to drop all tables? I guess it's for the dev environment to etch-a-sketch to a known state?

Yikes.

3 comments

> No one doing dev in a dev environment should have such trivial access to prod

It’s the new and hip ‘cloud’! Probably using planetscale or something like that, which (last I checked, maybe it changed but wasn’t on), doesn’t even have ip protections outside the mysql user settings (while bad, would’ve protected them).

> Are there still good reasons for a migration to drop all tables?

We haven’t found any.

I'd suggest reading up on what some of these new database providers are doing to help prevent or fix mistakes like this. Since you mentioned PlanetScale, I'll use them as an example.

1) PlanetScale has IP ACLs, which locks down passwords to specific IP addresses. [1] Additionally, with TailScale or another VPN solution, locking down based on IP isn't necessary foolproof.

2) They also have Safe Migrations. When enabled, it prevents DDL from being run directly on a database. [2] Additionally, using deploy requests for zero-downtime schema migrations also allows you to use reverts, which will revert the migration. [3]

[1] https://planetscale.com/blog/introducing-ip-restrictions

[2] https://planetscale.com/docs/concepts/safe-migrations

[3] https://planetscale.com/blog/behind-the-scenes-how-schema-re...

PlanetScale has Safe Migrations which you can enabled for your production DB (branch). Wondering though whether this will protect against everything mentioned here.

https://planetscale.com/docs/concepts/safe-migrations

Safe Migrations would prevent this completely. PlanetScale also allows you to restore multiple backups in parallel.
really? i've definitely done it before on my local as a quicker alternative to cleaning up the docker container/volume, doesn't seem that bad

ofc i'd think differently if i was also putting write-permission prod credentials into my machine, but luckily i haven't been in many places doing that

In addition, Every centralized storage, and every cloud provider lets you take a snapshot of a database's disks.

We can restore a 10TB disk in about 12 minutes. its much faster to snapshot, do migration, then if necessary, drop disk and remake from snapshot. (and then replay the replay any other WAL changes up to the exact second you want with a tool like barman, wall-e, pg_backreset, etc.

Postgresql backups are critical for disaster recovery, but the restores are so very, very slow, they should be a last resort.

We have been working on bytebase (https://github.com/bytebase/bytebase) for 3+ years to address this. With a change review workflow, environment propagations, and try not to disturb the dev flow if possible.