[ux-app]

>All it's doing is noticing that makes no sense and saying so. How could it not recognize it?

you say that like it's the simplest thing in the world. it really amazes me how quickly people acclimate to this mind-blowing tech.

[fsmv]

I just mean, given that LLMs exist this isn't a surprising result. It only looks surprising because the UI makes you forget that each prompt is a completely new universe to the model.

[block_dagger]

I wouldn't call a step in a history-aware conversation a completely new universe. By that logic, every single time a token is generated is a new universe even though the token is largely dependent on the prompt, which includes custom instructions, chat history, and all tokens generated in the response so far.

[mewpmewp2]

Well, I would have also said or thought that each token actually is a new universe in a sense. You could rotate between different LLMs for each token for example or instances of the same LLM or branch into different possibilities. Input gets cycled again as a whole.

[intended]

I’m not sure how you are using the term “history aware”, Would a time series forecasting tool be history aware ?