|
|
|
|
|
by aeonik
851 days ago
|
|
His work is definitely worthwhile. Wolfram Language by itself is actually very cool. I really wish he would open source it. I'm not going to use any math package that isn't open source for anything. I think his physics work is pretty interesting as well. I think the reason he aggrandizes, and this is only speculation, is because he is pushing the envelope in many fields simultaneously and wants to "credentialize" himself, and give people context on his background. He might also be insecure self-absorbed. Which, while annoying, doesn't disqualify someone's ideas by itself. It just means you might need to watch for ego-based confabulations in their work. It might also mean he's a pain to work with, if it is indeed an ego thing. But I don't know the guy... so it's all speculation. |
|
Here is the official statements of Wolfram Research on this topic:
> Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source—A Dozen Reasons
> https://blog.wolfram.com/2019/04/02/why-wolfram-tech-isnt-op...
See also
> Episode 1: Thoughts on Wolfram & Open Source
> https://soundcloud.com/wolframresearch/wolfram-on-open-sourc...
If you nevertheless insist on having an open source implementation of the Wolfram language, have a look at the answers at
> https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/4454/is-ther...