|
|
|
|
|
by runlaszlorun
846 days ago
|
|
I was about to post exactly the same… haha. I’ve been doing a recent deep dive in languages as part of my own overly ambitious language attempt and only recently found out that Logo was in fact Lisp based. I’m guessing that the reason it might not have taken off is because, unfortunately, it was looked upon as a ‘kid language’. The goals of Papert and others seem a far cry from where tech has landed today. edit: for an egregious typo |
|