Wait this doesn’t make sense. They own the code I wrote for them. The ‘subscription’ is for future updates of that code. They can keep the version and never update. If I quit they still have what I wrote.
And they pay you 10,000X the cost of $3/month for the ability to own that code.
But it seems you still aren’t following the hypocrisy inherent here.
If this one time payment + ownership model is so great for everyone as you say, why aren’t you working exclusively as a project-based freelancer? Why hasn’t your employer fired you the minute you finish every project?
Is the company that hired you stupid? Are you taking advantage of them?
Or does the subscription model for software only make sense when you’re the one selling it?
But it seems you still aren’t following the hypocrisy inherent here.
If this one time payment + ownership model is so great for everyone as you say, why aren’t you working exclusively as a project-based freelancer? Why hasn’t your employer fired you the minute you finish every project?
Is the company that hired you stupid? Are you taking advantage of them?
Or does the subscription model for software only make sense when you’re the one selling it?