|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
850 days ago
|
|
>An issue with doing a COVID-19 challenge trial that I heard from someone in this space at the time: Nobody actually knew how much virus to administer. We weren't sure of the normal quantity of COVID-19 a person typically inhales before becoming sick. I dont think that is accurate. You dont have to know the actual viral quantity transmitted to create a representative transmission event. That is to say, if you know people can catch covid sitting side by side, that can be your challenge. Even if the scenario isn't perfect, you still know how many people caught it vs placebo. |
|
If you're okay with potentially killing most of the trial participants, I suppose you could still get useful data, but the ethics become significantly more questionable IMO.
Edit: I just re-read your post. I think you're saying, you wouldn't actually give anyone the COVID virus directly, you'd just find someone who was known to have contracted COVID in the wild and bring them in to purposefully expose trial participants. That is an interesting idea which I've never seen discussed in the context of a challenge trial. I'd be interested to read more about why this is not typically done.