|
|
|
|
|
by tsimionescu
847 days ago
|
|
I didn't say it's useless, I said it's a niche utility. There are, what, 10 even slightly commonly used shells? Compared to the thousands of other programs that spawn processes, I think shells count as a niche use. If fork() and exec() had been kept as the niche utilities they are in addition to a more commonly used spawn() syscall, fork() and exec() could have remained simple and small, and not needed all the CoW magic and many other complex features at all. |
|
- clone CLONE_FILES with AF_UNIX socketpair
- send file descriptors through the socket
- do whatever was in shenanigans (you have the socket for communication/RPC/whatever)
- exec
or maybe even easier:
- clone CLONE_FILES with pipe or two
- do whatever was in shenanigans (you have the pipe for communication/RPC/whatever)
- exec