|
|
|
|
|
by swatcoder
846 days ago
|
|
That some "work" requires lifelong consumption of a stimulant with a fragile supply chain maybe reflects a deeper problem than any shortage itself. Why are your coworkers so committed to this work if it suits them so poorly? Are they really unable to perform any work without a drug? It's a little wild that people would sooner see themselves as "ill" and in need of $xx/mo of side effects and shortages for the rest of their lives than think that maybe the expectations they've put on themselves aren't right. Maybe the work is not a good suit for them. Maybe their lives are structured poorly. Maybe your whole industry or social class is broken and is demanding more from people than they can deliver without drugs. A shortage is a really good opportunity to look more closely at those possibilities, especially the last one. |
|
It would take a long time to explain adequately. But to summarize, neurodivergence can be a pervasive, debilitating problem for people, and medication is in many ways a miracle cure. And the solutions you suggest require the exact type of executive function that sufferers are lacking.
Of course it would be nice to wave a wand and change society instead, but that's not going to happen.