|
|
|
|
|
by aulin
849 days ago
|
|
Eglot philosophy is to hook into existing emacs features instead of reinventing the wheel, so you may find some of the lsp-mode/lsp-ui features in other packages. imenu-list for sideline navigation, breadcrumb, flymake has a way to display inline diagnostics (can never remember how as I don't use it and google does not help). I work on a huge codebase with eglot+clangd and the few times where it gets slow is where there are tons of flymake warnings. Like when you enable all the clang-tidy checks. |
|
I officially started with .NET back in 2008 and, at the time, you really had to use Visual Studio. I knew emacs was not an option at that time. Since .NET Core I knew I was getting closer and closer for emacs becomming an option.
Then comes Visual Studio Code.
I have experiemented with C# development in emacs for a few years, now. I cannot remember now but it was likely with lsp-mode. When I found out eglot is in v29, it was time to revisit it. It has been positive so far.
I actually forced myself doing .net development in emacs this weekend. I am 90% there! Need to see if I can debug in emacs, now. I hope so!
Once I am happy, I will continue to add more interactive functions, saving me typing 'dotnet cli..' commands. I also need to revisit yasnippet to make coding more effecient in C#.
Getting started with eglot and C# was pretty painless, thanks to this link:- https://www.johansivertsen.com/post/emacs-29-csharp/