I'm wondering if you're describing beam search? Iirc last time I brought that up here someone explained that as models have gotten better it just didn't really make a difference.
I wasn’t thinking something like beam search, I think this seems kind of unnatural. I can imagine that the human brain is doing something like GPT, but I can’t imagine it’s doing something like a beam search.
I was more thinking a model that writes to a piece of scratch paper to gain confidence. But it doesn’t have to actually output the scratch paper that it uses, it’s totally hidden from the user.
You could take this a step further, and have something like a “two-brained” model, where the original model falls back on a secondary model if it’s not confident in its response. This resembles a “fast” and “slow” brain.
I think the scratch paper idea has been explored to some extent, but I’m not sure if people think it’s a dead end.
I was more thinking a model that writes to a piece of scratch paper to gain confidence. But it doesn’t have to actually output the scratch paper that it uses, it’s totally hidden from the user.
You could take this a step further, and have something like a “two-brained” model, where the original model falls back on a secondary model if it’s not confident in its response. This resembles a “fast” and “slow” brain.
I think the scratch paper idea has been explored to some extent, but I’m not sure if people think it’s a dead end.