Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by miga 852 days ago
Because this is counter-accusation.

If judge has all reasons to believe in fairness of the algorithm, then counter-accusation is the only way through.

2 comments

How can the “fairness” be determined if the specifics of the algorithm are not known to the judge, defense or jury?

We can’t allow people to be prosecuted by evidence that relies on black boxes.

The burden should be on the prosecution to prove that the algorithm is fair and reliable; the defendant is presumed innocent, ie falsely accused.