[Ludleth19]

I have no issue with technological advancement, it's obviously one of the pinnacles of human achievement- I have an issue with how those advancements are spread about and shared, especially shortly after large technological advancements happen.

We undoubtedly have reaped immense benefits from the industrial revolution for example- that doesn't mean I'd have any interest in living through it or that it was executed in a way that prioritized the people who lived during those times.

[inference-lord]

There is a super simple solution to the problem you're describing, get involved in and contribute to open source and education. It's this easy.

The more freely available the tech is, the easier it is to reproduce, the less the average joe is going to be locked out of the benefits.

My entire career and everything good in my working life has involved open source software and I'm sure that it will continue to be the case.

[Ludleth19]

Open source stuff is great, and I support it and have contributed to projects myself, but people bandy it out as if it's a silver bullet and I have my reservations there. The issue goes way beyond technology itself, it's structural/sociological/cultural and that's not going to be fixed just because there are open source alternatives.

[inference-lord]

It's not a silver bullet, nothing is, no one said that, but it's the best chance at democratizing technology that we have.

[shortrounddev2]

How does contributing to open source software and education help me pay the bills in a world where my job has been automated

[inference-lord]

It doesn't stop that, but would you prefer a world where you're unemployed and locked out of the technology, or unemployed, and have access to the technology so you can learn and use it for free to maybe get back in the game?

[shortrounddev2]

If I'm unemployed what's the difference