[dmd]

As someone who interviews people… definitely not a troll. There are SO MANY people like this and they’re so incredibly sure that they’re right that they absolutely DO write letters like this, because they’re SURE they’re going to be told they’re right.

[buffington]

I've interviewed hundreds of people, possibly closer to 1000, and can confirm: there are actually people like this.

I once asked a candidate how DNS worked. It's something that even junior candidates for this role should have known, but this candidate tried to insist that "DNS worked because of the DOM" (as in, the browser DOM). When asked to clarify, and given plenty of chances to save themselves, they continued to insist, claiming that "Javascript and React handled all that." That stopped their candidacy immediately - less because of the lack of technical skills, and more because of their unwillingness to even explore the possibility that they were wrong. You can teach someone how the DOM and DNS work, but not someone who's unwilling to admit when they're wrong.

[dr_kiszonka]

Since you are so experienced in this area, I am wondering about candidates on the other end of the spectrum. When asked about my greatest weaknesses, I could easily list at least 10. What kind of answers to this question would you expect from good candidates?

[buffington]

Someone asking "what's your greatest weakness" style questions isn't typically looking for specifics - they're looking for reasons to disqualify you.

There's also little value to the answer. You either learn that someone is a delusional liar who has no weaknesses, or, you get people describing how they "care too much" or "tend to be a perfectionist," - both of which are basically worthless answers as well.

If I were to ask that question, I'd consider it valuable to hear about how the candidate realized they had a weakness. What was its impact? Did they do anything to try to fix it?

If you're asked "what's your greatest weakness," I don't think you can go wrong by reframing the question in your mind to "describe a problem/event that was significant in your career growth, either because of the hard truth it taught you, or because of the consequences it made you face." It may not be a strict answer to the question, but it serves as a way of telling the interviewer that you get it.

For example, I might ask a software engineer to describe one of their most challenging bugs - I'd want them to tell me what made it challenging. How'd they discover the bug? When did they realize they knew what was wrong? Why'd it make it to production in the first place? What did they learn when solving it?

I think if you can tell a good story that answers those questions, your "weaknesses" can become the reasons why you get hired.

[dr_kiszonka]

Thank you for your advice, buffington – very valuable!