|
|
|
|
|
by medimikka
857 days ago
|
|
Not so much business, as real medicine. The reason people get pissed at medicine is that it moves "slow" by their standards. But Jason M Somebody in his garage already built a cryo scalpel, why are you not using it? Well, Thalidomide, the aforementioned cryo scalpel, Paolo Macchiarini, and others have taught us, that that's never a good idea. It's 2024. We're throwing our lot in with serodiagnostics over anatomical localization, a PET scan being the only thing we need these days. If we know it's a lesion and we can FNA it, we will, else there's enough serodiagnostically we can do, to build individualized treatment plans (or determine if there's even a reason to use them). It's pretty fun to see the computer draw little circles around lesions. The Bruker solution (also Open Source and free, by the by) does this admirably well. But it's neither useful in diagnostics nor in therapy, since both don't really hinge on a circle around a lesion. |
|
It seems plausible to argue that if you can afford a CT and a radiation therapy machine, then you probably meet the resource bar for the new family of techniques, but I just don’t have much of a reference point to judge.