|
|
|
|
|
by The_Colonel
857 days ago
|
|
> No, it doesn't cover trans men who will give birth to become the baby's father. Why? > If we give advice for "expecting mothers" not to sleep on their backs... Yes, but a) you rarely need such differentiation. b) I'm pretty sure people would understand what is meant from the context. |
|
Because they're fathers, not mothers.
> a) you rarely need such differentiation
How common does it need to be before precise language becomes preferable?
Around one in a 100 couples with children are same sex couples, at least in the US. Acceptance rates of homosexuay vary of course and laws have been lagging behind, so we can expect this number to raise as acceptance grows. Inclusive language is part of that acceptance.
You also have many families with adoptive mothers who didn't give birth to their children.
> b) I'm pretty sure people would understand what is meant from the context
And I'm pretty sure even children can understand the term pregnant person. I'm surprised that so many people here are confused by it