|
I think you're saying two things, so I'll address each. 1. "Google" and "Yahoo!" seemed funny in 1994, but we're used to them. It's possible. This is what most people answer about DDG. I think this is wrong. Google and Yahoo!, while funny names, sound "cool". DuckDuckGo doesn't. My memory isn't great, so I can't be sure I'm right about this, but I'm pretty sure that the first time I heard "Google" or "Yahoo!", I had a much better reaction than the first (and every) time I hear "DuckDuckGo". I also think it's not smart to cling to the "people will get used to it, Google was the same" defense. If it's true, sure. I think it's not, and it's just misleading and true-sounding enough that DuckDuckGo keeps going. 2. The domain name itself is a problem (long, annoying to type, etc.), and once they get ddg it will be better. I agree on this point, although I do think the name is still an important point, not just for the domain. It's a brand. I'd like to reiterate that I'm not saying this things to be a critic, or just to be mean. I really value the work of DuckDuckGo, I think it's great that there's good competition to Google, and I'm a fan of Gabriel Weinberg. I'm only saying this because it's an issue that keeps coming up, and I really think it has a bad effect on DuckDuckGo. |
Actually, you can already use www.ddg.gg, which redirect you to the HTTPS version of DDG.