|
|
|
|
|
by achristoffersen
5150 days ago
|
|
I have no idea why web2py gotten such a bad rep. I am a beginning webdeveloper and seriously: web2py is a pleasure to work with. Simple to start, deploy, port and hack. It's backwards compatible and has a template language that really is non existant as so far as its pure python. Compare that to Rails - which is (comparable) hell to set-up and breaks with upgrades etc. If you want python web development to be simple, web2py is the way to go. Since I don't have a CS degree and I have often been wrong before - there might be a real problem somewhere. But I don't think so. One of the reasons for this is that Jakob Moss removed his web2py bashing from this thread. Didn't edit - removed it: https://www.quora.com/Is-web2py-a-good-Python-web-framework/... |
|
What did he remove?
https://www.quora.com/Is-web2py-a-good-Python-web-framework/...
This isn't the first instance of Django/Flask people not agreeing with web2py design and implementation, and they have been vocal about it a couple of times.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/ex54j/seeking_clarif...
Look for comments by mitsuhiko(flask dev) and jacobian(django dev).