Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Someone 860 days ago
> Probably the biggest issues I could imagine are maintenance and wildlife. They might be minor issues though.

Might, yes, but I think it’s unlikely all problems will be minor. Salt water isn’t kind to metal, no matter how well painted. Also, I expect barnacles will start growing on it. If you’re a filter feeder, this may be even better than sitting on the sea bed or on a whale.

Question will be how much that effects their $/MWh calculation. The only real way to find out is to try, I guess.

2 comments

The good news is that we do have a bit of experience with metal machines that operate in sea water for decades. We (as in humanity, I don't) know exactly what to expect. You'd want to have a permanent service operation scaled exactly to how much overhauling capacity you need to put the tide kites in a round robin maintenance loop.
And yet, every other tidal powerplant has been rendered hopelessly useless by barnacles.
Have they? And how many of them can be ordered to surface under tide power, for easy maintenance access and towing into a maintenance dock without involving expensive divers?

I presume the tether on this would be built long enough for controlled surfacing, a longer tether means larger deadzone between inbound and outbound tide, but there won't be much energy in the flow close to the turning point anyways.

We are perfectly capable of removing barnacles from ship hulls. What makes these kite hulls different?

These are just fancy boats you know.

Maybe we don't even care if barnacles grow on it since it's kind of a water catcher anyway.

Or if not this design, maybe one could be designed to either not care or even benefit from barnacles.

Remove the whole problem of fighting it.