Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nirvdrum 858 days ago
The deductible losses are supposed to be incurred in pursuit of profit. Not every expense a business incurs is tax deductible. Not even trying to sell it calls into question whether it was in pursuit of profit. They’re expecting the American tax payer to make up the shortfall and that’s likely based on Hollywood’s unique accounting practices, which has a tendency to inflate the claimed expense amount.
1 comments
gruez 858 days ago
>Not every expense a business incurs is tax deductible.

True, there are multiple reasons why some expenses aren't deductible, but AFAIK no such exception exists for "intentionally destroying it".

>and that’s likely based on Hollywood’s unique accounting practices, which has a tendency to inflate the claimed expense amount.

See my other comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39339493

There's no way that you can save taxes by doing this.

link
nirvdrum 858 days ago
> True, there are multiple reasons why some expenses aren't deductible, but AFAIK no such exception exists for "intentionally destroying it".

No, of course not. There isn't an enumerated list of weird cases and if your weird case doesn't match you can get a tax advantage. There are rules about what is and isn't deductible and if you're unclear, you can ask the IRS for a clarification. If you don't get that clarification you better be prepared to adequately defend your tax theory when you get audited. What I suggested is what they're doing may not be in line with the rules about what is deductible. It seems like something should be evaluated.

> There's no way that you can save taxes by doing this.

You absolutely can save taxes by doing this. They're not only not paying any tax, they're offsetting tax they would otherwise pay on a profitable film. I think what you're saying is that they couldn't get enough tax deductions to offset the money they put into the film development. That's a claim I didn't make. I do think it's possible they could get back more money than they otherwise should. It's not like tax fraud is a rare occurrence. And that situation could make this maneuver more attractive. I think it's worth an audit.

link