[stellalo]

> If I include the time for Julia to start up and compile the script, my implementation takes 354 ms total, on the same level as Mojo's.

I don’t think the article mentions it explicitly, but I suppose the timing is from Julia 1.10: as far as I can remember, this kind of execution time would have been impossible in Julia 1.8 even to run a simple script.

Bravo, Julia devs. Bravo.

[adgjlsfhk1]

for a script like this that doesn't have any dependencies, Julia 1.10 doesn't make a significant difference. that said, for real world usability, Julia 1.10 is dramatically better than previous versions.