[solumunus]

> Now, if your complaint is rather that you can call whatever method and pass in your bogus data

This entire comment thread is a discussion about how to prevent that from being a possibility. The person I responded to threw their hat in with a Typescript solution that doesn’t achieve the goal being discussed. I was simply pointing this out.

[WuxiFingerHold]

>> I've found validators to be much more error-prone than leveraging Go's built-in type checker.

>This entire comment thread is a discussion about how to prevent that from being a possibility.

No, this thread is also about how much you need to invest to be safe enough, when time and resources are limited.